Labels and Wall Street

The Occupy Movement shows a connection between a dominant
group and a non-dominant group. Within the Occupy movement there are several
different labels for each group. Martin and Nakayama state that we often use
labels as signifiers to acknowledge particular aspects of our social identity
(2010). First there are the wealthy and the poor. The poor view this label
negatively and are trying to change the meaning of such labels while the
wealthy are comfortable and proud of being wealthy. Another label that was assigned
by the non-dominant group to themselves is “the 99%.” Although this label
emphasizes that the non-dominant group indeed is not wealthy, it also gives a
sense of pride by showing that they are part of a bigger community. By making
this distinction, the 99 percenters hope to create a more clear picture for
others and inform the country of the problems going on with capitalism and the
distribution of wealth in the United States.
The wealthy have a different perception than the poor due
to the environment that surrounds them. Language is another aspect that shapes
the way we perceive the world. As an English speaker I feel a sense of being at
home in the United States. English dominates business and often people have the
idea that English is the dominating language of the world. When people believe
that English is the most important language it can distort one’s thought
processes. Individuals who speak a language other than English may feel
resentment toward the language and its speakers or feel as if the language is superior
to their own. Individuals who speak English may be oblivious to the importance
of learning other languages and the culture attached to them. It is important
for English speakers to expand the languages that they speak in order to view
the world in more than one way.
It is apparent that the languages are different in the
way they are spoken but there are different levels of communication within the
language. Superiors in the United States may be treated differently from superiors
in a different country. The components of language can help a person better
understand how others expect to be communicated with verbally and nonverbally. Things
such as eye contact, personal space, silence, and gestures play a big role on
whether a person receives your message in the way you intended. These cultural
aspects vary from language to language and can be the deciding factor in
whether the message was received. In studying a new language a person learns
the importance of nonverbal communication within the language and this helps to
communicate better as a whole.
References
Gautney, H. (2011, October 10). What is Occupy Wall Street? The history of leaderless movements. Retrieved from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-10- 10/national/35277702_1_heather-gautney-movement-gay-rights
Cornwell, P. (2011, October 15). Hundreds step out to 'Occupy Lincoln'. Retrieved from http://journalstar.com/news/local/hundreds-step-out-to-occupy-lincoln/article_14862b0e- ef99-56dd-bb64-915744f8f82f.html
Barr, M. (2013, September 17). Occupy Wall Street Plans Rallies on Second Anniversary of Movement. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/17/occupy-wall- street-anniversary_n_3939995.html
Martin, J. N., &
Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Intercultural communication in context.
(6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
I like how you pointed out how individual's lifestyles sometimes play a role in how we percieve and use labels. It's very important to understand exactly who are using labels and look for reasons why the use of that label would appeal to them and their motives.
ReplyDeleteGreat level of detail, watch the formatting on the reference page.
ReplyDelete