History to Histories: Influence on Communication
There are
many influences on communication, and more specifically intercultural
communication, in the world we live in. Limiting "history" to a
singular term is detrimental to intercultural communication because it doesn't
allow for influence on communication. To effectively understand how to
communicate, we must first understand the identity of those we wish to
communicate with. "Many different kinds of history influence our
understanding of who we are-as individuals, as family members, as members of cultural
groups, and as citizens of a nation" (Martin & Nakayama, 2013, P.
128), which in turn influences how we communicate. Without understanding
the many different kinds of histories such as, political, intellectual, social,
absent, family, national, and cultural-group, we cannot effectively
initiate intercultural communication. It is only when we understand
where our identities come from, that we are able to see the power in how
history is perceived, and what impact that has on intercultural communication.
In 1955,
a woman named Rosa Parks was sitting on a bus, behind the rows designated to
whites. When the bus started to fill up, Rosa and four other
African-Americans were asked to give up their seats, and all but Rosa complied.
The bus driver then had Rosa arrested, convicted of violating segregation
laws, and fined. After this, a boycott was initiated in Montgomery,
Alabama, which created a huge economic threat to the city, as most bus riders
were blacks. This simple, courageous act of saying no, and standing her ground,
is what started the Civil Rights movement, and ultimately the rights of blacks
were established. However, Rosa Parks was not the first to be arrested on
a bus in Montgomery, Alabama. In an article I read, the author
states, "Two other women had been arrested on buses in Montgomery
before Parks and were considered by black leaders as potential clients for
challenging the law. However, both were rejected because black leaders felt
they would not gain white support" ("Henry Ford").
This is a perfect example of hidden histories and also has large implications
on intercultural communication.
If these
"black leaders" had chosen one of the other two women, how would the
white-American public have reacted? Would history have been the same?
This is important because if those that chose to use Rosa Parks during
the civil rights movement hadn't had an understanding for the white-American,
and how to communicate their message to them, there could have been a huge
delay in the Civil Rights movement. In the United States, there are many
different cultural-groups. It is because of this diversity that we must
understand how history is perceived by not only the general American public,
but by the cultural-groups within our nation, if we can expect to engage in
effective intercultural communication. In shifting from history
(singular), to histories (plural) we can better understand where people come
from. These specific histories help us to determine identities and in
turn help us to develop a deeper understanding of intercultural communication.
References
Martin, J.N., & Nakayama, T.K. (2013). Intercultural
Communication in Contexts (6th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
"Rosa Parks Bus." The Henry Ford.
N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Sep 2013.
<http://www.thehenryford.org/exhibits/rosaparks/story.asp>.
Thank you for sharing that story about Rosa Parks and the Civil Rights Movement. It is always refreshing to hear such inspiring stories from that era. I believe it is a common theme among our blogs that intercultural communication needs to be developed upon within the U.S. There is such a strong focus on ONE history rather than many, which this nation is comprised of.
ReplyDeleteJesse,
ReplyDeleteI found your blog very, very interesting. I had heard in the past that Rosa Parks was not the first African American to do what she did, but didn't see it documented until I saw your blog. I think that choosing Rosa Parks to stand behind was almost a marketing decision for the Civil Rights community. They had to pick a person to stand behind that the public could empathize with and someone who could stand up to the adversity that would surely come from being in the spotlight.
Nice job on your blog!
Would like to see you integrate some additional sources into your argument to support these points. I only see one non-text reference.
ReplyDelete