Several
events from our history leave a lasting impression on our lives even if we
weren’t around to see it happen. We rely on the people that write about
significant historical instances to relay the information in a factual way. Chapter
4, History and Intercultural Communication,
explains that historical writings are often one sided. It is often easy to see
how politics affected each country at the time by the way it is projected in
the writing (Martin & Nakayama, 2013). When history is recorded from the point
of view of a mainstream culture, we may only be getting the partial truth about
what really happened. Nonmainstream culture plays an important role in the identities
of the people in that cultural group. Many of these nonmainstream cultural groups
have histories that have been suppressed and possibly forgotten by the
mainstream cultures (Martin & Nakayama, 2013). These hidden histories have
led me to question the truth behind some of the things that I have been taught
about the history of the United States.
Everyone
who was raised in America knows, or has at least heard about Pearl Harbor. In
December of 1941 hundreds of Japanese warplanes attacked a U.S. base in Hawaii.
According to the written history, the Japanese were sent to internment camps to
protect others from future terroristic attacks. This previous statement encompasses
the “white American identity” and leads readers to believe that it is fact when
there may be more to the story (Martin & Nakayama, 2013). When history is viewed from the White
American standpoint, injustices such as these are often left out or written in a
way that makes America look better. In order to right their wrongs, in 1988 the
government distributed official apologies and a $20,000 payment to each
surviving Japanese internee ("The war at,"). Although it seems as if this is minute
compared to what the internees suffered through, it was America’s way of fixing
their mistake and moving forward.
It
seems as if America feels that they are beyond segregating people out of fear, but
some recent events show that this may not be true. After the 9/11terrorist
attacks Americans were extremely cautious about other Muslims. Americans were
so afraid another attack would happen that they began detaining Muslims for
months until they could be cleared as non-threatening (Martin & Nakayama,
2013). The way Muslims were being treated was beginning to look familiar to how
the Japanese were treated years ago. The distrust of the Muslim religion seemed
to die down until 9 years after the attack. In 2010 the construction of a
Mosque at “Ground Zero” was approved. This approval led to a huge controversy across
the United States. The argument that allowing people with the same religious affiliation
as the terrorists would be destructive to the country. This outcry of
disapproval caused a frenzy in the media turning what normally would be a minor
issue into a reason for people all over the country to pick sides. President
Obama stepped in to take a stand against religious stereotypes as a way to calm
the country, but this only fueled the fire. How do we solve this dilemma?
My
thoughts on this subject are mixed. I understand that people are scared that a
terrorist attack may happen again; therefore they will go to great lengths to prevent
that. On the other hand, there are two reasons I think this is a flawed thought
process. My first issue with people taking offense to this is that many are
under the impression that terrorism is related to the Muslim religion; just as
people thought the same of the Japanese in the 1940’s. These judgments make it
hard for people to look beyond the fact that these people are separate from the
terrorists that happen to be from their country. In order for people to get
past being upset over the building of the mosque, they must first remove the
thought that the religion/race of a terrorist makes all people of the same religion/race
a terrorist as well. The Second thing that bothers me is that by discriminating
the Muslim religion, it makes it hard for the followers of the religion to practice
freely. Every other American has the right to practice any religion they choose
and American Muslim’s have this right as well. In order to move forward from
the judging of this particular religion we must learn to not live in fear and
realize that all American citizens have the same rights.
References
The war at home. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/thewar/at_home_civil_rights_japanese_american.htm
Martin, J. N., &
Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Intercultural communication in context.
(6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Mariah,
ReplyDeleteDo you think Americans are overly cautious because of a collective group feeling or because of the major events that have happened in US history, like 9/11 for example? I think you make a lot of great points and I enjoyed reading your blog post!
Really great connection you made between Japanese internment camps, after Pearl Harbor, and detaining of muslims, after 9/11. Although I agree that we can't keep using stereotypes to engage in major decisions, even after traumatic events, I also feel that it is in the American history that creates this problem. The fear that is associated with these traumatic events "fuels the fire" to discrimination and stereotyping. Great Blog Mariah!!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the last paragraph when dealing with Muslims freely practicing there religion. Americans need to broaden their cultural lenses and perhaps get a sense of how deeply muslims are connected with their faith. Religion is what brings people together, not a thing that pushes others away.
ReplyDelete