Thursday, October 24, 2013

Buddhism and Identity-Cultural Reporter Post 2


Religious identity is an interesting topic.  While it may play an important role in some individual’s lives, it might be on the back burner for others.  A person can feel very close with their religious group, while others have less of a sense of belonging.  Buddhism, specifically, can fit on both ends of the spectrum depending on an individual’s level of commitment to the practice.  Practiced by over 300 million people worldwide, this religion experiences some different forms of religious identity (White 1993).  

Some opt to say they are Buddhists, while others feel that it doesn’t make sense with the Buddhist doctrines to do so.  Furthermore, some consider Buddhism a religion, while others believe it to be a philosophy and practice the teachings.
            What sets Buddhism apart from other religions is that a person can be considered a Buddhist while simultaneously staying affiliated with another religion as well.  Buddhism is technically seen as a philosophy by some, a way of life, rather than a religion.  Many practice Buddhism without identifying as a Buddhist, and this is acceptable (O’Brien 2012).  The interesting point is that Buddhism welcomes other religions and acknowledges their existence. 



            Not only can Buddhism be considered both a religion and a philosophy, but it also can differ among locations as well.  Different “schools of Buddhism [are] unlike one another” (Diskul 2010).  The identity of a Buddhist could differ based on location as well.  Southeast Asian Buddhists, for example, are harder to connect with thoughtfully and spiritually over western Buddhists.

            Interestingly enough, though, many regularly practicing Buddhists don’t personally outright identify themselves as Buddhists.  This is because the Buddhist doctrine, anatta, points out that there is no true “self” (O’Brien 2012).  Therefore, it would be impossible to identify oneself as a Buddhist.  Instead, the man is dynamic, and ever-changing (Diskul 2010).  These specific people feel that the “self” and “identity” are constraining.
            Overall, Buddhists are encouraged to test the teachings themselves.  They must make their own decisions and get out of the teachings what they want (White 1993). 


            In terms of data collectors, I have made a contact with Courtney Bruntz, an instructor at UNL’s Department of Classics and Religious Studies.  I have made a plan with Courtney to visit a Vietnamese Buddhist Temple on November 3rd.  There, we will experience a service and attend a luncheon shortly after.  I also plan to talk to some of Courtney’s Buddhist pupils that will be attending the service as well. 
            I plan to interview Courtney the week after I experience the service, once I’ve gathered my thoughts.  In terms of questions, I’ll ask Courtney about Buddhists and how far they go to identify themselves.  I was given a very broad answer when researching on my own.  I also want to look into the way Buddhism has modernized as it has gradually moved west, and why it is so appealing for more and more to become part of Buddhism as well.  It’s a very wide-ranged religion, and I plan to narrow it down in terms of understanding the basic philosophies and beliefs.  I would also like to dicuss how Buddhists interact amongst each other, if that is even an option. 



Diskul, P. P. (2010).  The relevance of Buddhism in the modern world.  Buddhism Publication Society.  Retrieved from http://www.bps.lk/olib/bl/bl043-u.html


O’Brien, B. (2012).  Can you be a Buddhist and a (fill in the blank)?  About Religion and Spirituality.  Retrieved from http://buddhism.about.com/b/2012/03/14/can-you-be-a-buddhist-and-a-fill-in-the-blank.htm

White, B.  (1993).  A basic Buddhism guide.  Buddha Dharma Education Association and BuddhaNet.  Retrieved from http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/5minbud.htm


No comments:

Post a Comment